Simplifying ML Pipelines with BigQuery ML and MLflow: A Developer-Friendly Guide
- SquareShift Content Team

- Jul 10, 2025
- 6 min read
Updated: Jan 20

If you’ve ever tried scaling machine learning pipelines, you’ve likely encountered the chaos of SQL scripts scattered across notebooks, inconsistent environments, unclear model versions, and no centralized visibility. One day you're predicting customer churn, the next you're debugging a half-broken model someone trained months ago. Sound familiar?
That’s the exact challenge we faced until we discovered a better path with BigQuery ML (BQML) and MLflow model tracking.
In this guide, we’ll break down how we combined BigQuery ML pipelines with MLflow to build scalable, developer-friendly workflows. Whether you’re just exploring machine learning with BigQuery or already deploying models across GA4 data, this is a blueprint worth borrowing.
Why BigQuery ML Changed the Game
The first thing we noticed about BigQuery ML was how radically it simplified our machine learning workflow. Instead of exporting data, training models externally, and pushing predictions back into BigQuery, we could now do everything inside the warehouse.
This shift eliminated:
Time-consuming data transfers
Cross-environment inconsistencies
Manual syncing between platforms

With serverless ML pipelines, all our data stayed within BigQuery fast, clean, and secure. And since our team already used Looker, Vertex AI, and Data Studio, BQML naturally fits into our existing Google Cloud ML workflow.
Key Benefits:
Data never leaves BigQuery
Reduced complexity and setup time
Seamless integration with downstream tools
This isn’t just theory. We’ve used BQML to build and deploy live models that power dashboards, trigger alerts, and support product decisions, all without needing a dedicated ML infra team.
Scaling Across GA4 with Template-Driven Modeling
If you’re working with GA4 machine learning, BQML is practically a cheat code.
Since GA4 exports directly into BigQuery in a standardized format, we created a reusable modeling template to handle everything from purchase prediction to churn analysis. With only a few parameter changes, like property ID or date filters, we could spin up new models for different clients in minutes.
Reusable Template Examples:
Purchase Propensity: Users are likely to convert
Churn Prediction: Users likely to drop off
Engagement Modeling: Users likely to read/watch/share
This standardization allowed our analysts and data scientists to scale personalized insights without reinventing the wheel for every engagement.
Adding MLflow: Memory for Your Models

While BQML made training simple, tracking was a different story. We quickly ended up with dozens of SQL files, varied feature sets, and metrics scattered across dashboards and spreadsheets. That’s when we added MLflow to the equation.
MLflow gave our models a memory.
Each training run, manual or automated, was logged with:
GA4 property used
Business objective (e.g., churn, purchase)
Training windows and data filters
SQL scripts and configurations
Evaluation metrics like AUC, recall, precision
Artifacts like configs and exported code
Now we could open the MLflow UI, filter by project or objective, and instantly compare any two runs. This wasn’t just convenient it was critical for reproducibility, collaboration, and decision-making.
Step-by-Step: Our Standardized ML Pipeline

Here’s the technical flow we now follow for each experiment. Whether you're building a churn model or testing a new engagement strategy, this method ensures structure and traceability:
Start an MLflow run
Log context: GA4 property, objective, date range
Capture SQL: for both data prep and modeling
Train model in BigQuery ML
Evaluate using ML.EVALUATE()
Log metrics (AUC, precision, recall)
Upload artifacts (SQL, configs) to MLflow
Register model version if performance is acceptable
This setup turned our messy workflows into end-to-end ML pipelines for GA4 that were fast, auditable, and repeatable.
Developer-Friendly Automation with iBQML + CRMint :
To make this even more accessible for non-engineers, we built a lightweight UI using iBQML.
Team members can now:
Select the GA4 property
Choose a modeling objective
Define the training window and filters
Launch the experiment
CRMint takes care of orchestration, BQML does the training, and MLflow logs everything quietly in the background.
Result: What once took hours of manual setup now happens in minutes, with full visibility and zero guesswork.
BQML vs Vertex AI: When to Use What?
A common question we get: Should we use BigQuery ML or Vertex AI?
Here’s our internal framework:
Use Case | Best Tool |
Quick prototyping inside BigQuery | BQML |
Scalable, standardized modeling over GA4 | BQML |
Deep learning, NLP, or custom models | Vertex AI |
AutoML pipelines with minimal config | Vertex AI |
Full orchestration across GCP services | Vertex AI Pipelines + BQML |
The sweet spot for BQML lies in structured data scenarios, especially where your data already lives in BigQuery. It removes friction and lets you focus on logic, not logistics.
What We Gained from This Approach

Combining BigQuery ML pipelines with MLflow gave us the best of both worlds: rapid experimentation with full control.
Benefits:
Analysts can launch experiments without deep ML knowledge
Engineers get full transparency and version history
Stakeholders see exactly how models were built and evaluated
No more redundant model development across teams
Reduced time to insights from days to hours
It’s a stack that scales with your team and evolves as your needs change.
Real-World Use Cases You Can Try:
Need inspiration? Here are real examples you can adapt today:
Marketing: Predict which users are most likely to convert based on GA4 events
Product: Analyze feature engagement and build content recommendation models
Support: Prioritize tickets using issue urgency and resolution history
Growth: Segment users based on activation and retention likelihood
These use cases don’t just exist in theory; we’ve deployed them across client accounts with measurable results.
Final Thoughts: Keep It Simple, Keep It Smart:
This isn’t about fancy ML stacks or chasing bleeding-edge tools. It’s about solving real problems with tools that fit together naturally.
BigQuery ML handles modeling, fast and serverless.
MLflow gives us memory, structure, and reproducibility.
Together, they create developer-friendly workflows that scale.
If you’re deep into data science with BigQuery, managing ML pipeline orchestration on GCP, or just tired of duplicating work across projects, this setup will save you time and sanity.
We’ve seen it first-hand. Simpler pipelines lead to faster decisions, cleaner experiments, and more confident deployments. And that’s exactly what you want when you’re building for impact. To Learn more about AI & ML
FAQs
1. How can BigQuery ML simplify machine learning pipelines for GA4 data?
BigQuery ML lets you train, evaluate, and deploy models directly inside BigQuery, eliminating time-consuming data transfers and cross-environment inconsistencies. For GA4 data, standardized templates can predict churn, purchase propensity, or engagement, enabling analysts and data scientists to scale personalized insights rapidly without complex infrastructure.
2. What role does MLflow play in managing BigQuery ML models?
MLflow provides a centralized memory for all your ML models, tracking SQL scripts, configurations, evaluation metrics, and artifacts. It ensures reproducibility, collaboration, and easy comparison of experiments. Combined with BQML, it transforms messy workflows into auditable, versioned pipelines that make ML development transparent and repeatable.
3. Should I use BigQuery ML or Vertex AI for my machine learning projects?
BigQuery ML is ideal for structured data, GA4 modeling, and rapid prototyping directly in your warehouse. Vertex AI is better for deep learning, NLP, AutoML, or orchestrating complex GCP workflows. Many teams use a hybrid approach: BQML for fast experimentation and Vertex AI for large-scale, custom ML solutions.
4. How can non-engineers run ML experiments with BigQuery ML?
With tools like iBQML and CRMint, non-technical team members can select GA4 properties, define modeling objectives, set training windows, and launch experiments through a lightweight UI. This automation reduces manual setup from hours to minutes, while MLflow logs all experiments in the background for full visibility and reproducibility.
5. How can Squareshift help our team implement BigQuery ML pipelines?
Squareshift helps organizations set up scalable BigQuery ML pipelines, from data preparation to model deployment. They standardize workflows, integrate GA4 data, and implement template-driven models for churn, purchase propensity, or engagement. This ensures faster experimentation, reproducibility, and minimal manual setup for your data teams.
6. Can Squareshift assist with MLflow model tracking and version control?
Yes. Squareshift configures MLflow to log all training runs, SQL scripts, evaluation metrics, and artifacts. Their experts help establish a centralized model memory, making collaboration easy, experiments auditable, and model deployment repeatable—eliminating inconsistencies and boosting confidence in ML-driven decisions.
7. Why should we choose Squareshift over building ML pipelines in-house?
Squareshift brings specialized expertise in BigQuery ML and MLflow, saving time and reducing errors from manual pipeline management. They provide developer-friendly automation, template-driven modeling, and GA4 integration, helping teams scale predictive analytics without needing a dedicated ML infrastructure team.




Comments